Clean license conditions: Difference between revisions
From Clean
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses: | Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses: | ||
* The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge | * The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge | ||
* A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: [mailto:rinus@cs.ru.nl rinus@cs.ru.nl] | * A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: [mailto:rinus@cs.ru.nl rinus@cs.ru.nl] | ||
Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org . | Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org . | ||
Revision as of 12:14, 6 July 2010
Clean and its standard libraries are available under two different licenses:
- The LGPL, the standard GNU Lesser General Open Source license, which is free of charge
- A commercial license that can be obtained from Prof.dr.ir. M.J. Plasmeijer, preferably via email: rinus@cs.ru.nl
Note, that development under the LGPL license entails some restrictions and responsibilities. More information on the nature of the LGPL is available at http://www.gnu.org/ and http://www.opensource.org .
A commercial license has the advantage that one is not obligated to make source code available. It furthermore gives right to technical support and is highly appreciated as a sign that you appreciate our work.
Users can choose under which license they wish to operate under.
December 12, 2002.
